Message-ID: <16162750.1075858961534.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:12:12 -0700 (PDT) From: diane.anderson@enron.com To: tana.jones@enron.com Subject: RE: ? re: Bankers Trust/ Deutsche Bank Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Anderson, Diane X-To: Jones, Tana X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \TJONES (Non-Privileged)\Jones, Tana\Inbox X-Origin: Jones-T X-FileName: TJONES (Non-Privileged).pst Hey Tana. I got a call this morning from someone in the DB offices in London who seems to think that the issues between us, relating to EOL I guess, are all settled - and she'd like to know where we'll be signing their assignment agreement. Can you give her a call: 011 44 207 547 0883 I think her name is Sara - but I listened to her messege 4 times, and can't really make out what she said her name was. Thanks, Diane -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Tana Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:14 PM To: Anderson, Diane; Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Heard, Marie Cc: Greenberg, Mark Subject: RE: ? re: Bankers Trust/ Deutsche Bank We are waiting for Mark Greenberg to finalize the negotiations on the amendment to the online ETA for DB. We would like to shut down BT from all financial trading. However, what we found was that DB will not execute the online ETA without some revisions. Mark is negotiating an amendment to the ETA with DB. Meanwhile, BT had already been trading online. Since that cat was already out of the bag so to speak, DB didn't want to shut them down from trading without having another avenue to trade, so we are continuing to trade as BT. We do not want to do this FOREVER, HOWEVER, so we do need to get BT SHUT DOWN. HOW GOES IT MARK???? -----Original Message----- From: Anderson, Diane Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:04 PM To: Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Jones, Tana; Heard, Marie Subject: ? re: Bankers Trust/ Deutsche Bank Howdy. Can one of you guys remind me where we stand with this sort-of merged counterparty? Last I recall while DB had bought BT, BT was still allowed to transact in its name - because we hadn't yet renegotiated an ISDA for the combined entity. Is that still where we stand? HELP!!!! :) Diane