Message-ID: <6844452.1075863235256.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:18:28 -0800 (PST) From: john.allario@enron.com To: mark.greenberg@enron.com Subject: FW: meeting & NDA Cc: tana.jones@enron.com, stephanie.panus@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: tana.jones@enron.com, stephanie.panus@enron.com X-From: Allario, John X-To: Greenberg, Mark X-cc: Jones, Tana , Panus, Stephanie X-bcc: X-Folder: \TJONES (Non-Privileged)\Jones, Tana\Inbox X-Origin: Jones-T X-FileName: TJONES (Non-Privileged).pst Mark Caminus took out reference to EOL. Would this be too broad? How can we accommodate their wishes below? -john -----Original Message----- From: Masiello, Ralph [mailto:ralph.masiello@caminus.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:44 AM To: Allario, John Subject: RE: meeting & NDA Our attorney was fine with the NDA except that by restricting it to information about the Enron On Line website, it would not cover material which Caminus might disclose to you in that meeting. Here it is back with a simple change to make it symmetric