Message-ID: <3704263.1075856522696.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: vince.kaminski@enron.com To: li.sun@enron.com Subject: RE: EOL competitors Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Vince J Kaminski X-To: Li Sun X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_4\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: Kaminski-V X-FileName: vkamins.nsf Li, Can you forward it to the team. Vince Li Sun@ENRON 01/29/2001 11:19 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RE: EOL competitors ---------------------- Forwarded by Li Sun/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001 11:18 AM --------------------------- From: Drew Ries/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/29/2001 11:15 AM To: Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: EOL competitors Li, Globally there are probably over 80 "competitors" to EOL. None of these competitors have a meaningful market share. Some of the names that jump to mind are the following, but it should be easy to find others by surfing the web. Good luck. Drew Dynergy Direct Houston Street Altra True Quote Intercontinental Exchange eNYMEX Coral Connect Koch Energy epetroleum.com Red Meteor Trade Spark American Petroleum Exchange Fuel Spot