Message-ID: <24053106.1075856462368.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 07:29:00 -0800 (PST) From: vince.kaminski@enron.com To: sally.beck@enron.com Subject: Benchmarking Study Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: vince.kaminski@enron.com X-From: Vince J Kaminski X-To: Sally Beck X-cc: Vince J Kaminski X-bcc: X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Kaminski-V X-FileName: vkamins.nsf Sally, I gave you some time ago a brochure on this benchmarking study request. They renewed their request for Enron's participation. What is your view on this? Do you think the benefits of knowing what's going on offset the loss due information released and time spent on the project. My recommendation is to forget it. Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/03/2001 03:28 PM --------------------------- "Theresa Sanders" on 12/27/2000 01:32:18 PM To: cc: Subject: Benchmarking Study Dear Vince, Peter Nance and I wanted to follow-up our discussion of Enron's participation in our benchmarking study. Have you discussed Enron's participation in the project with your colleagues? Here is a small sample set of metrics that were taken from a comprehensive list of over 700 metrics. The study group will decide which metrics to use. With EEI's credibility and Teknecon's technical expertise, we intend to become the industry standard in benchmarking. We would very much like to have Enron participate in the study. I would be happy to set up another meeting with you and your colleagues with Peter Nance if you think that would be helpful. Best regards, Theresa Sanders Director of Business Development Alliance of Energy Suppliers Edison Electric Institute Tel: 202-508-5183 - EEI metrics-short list.xls - ebrochure.doc - RiskBenc.ppt