Message-ID: <13024509.1075856495533.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 03:00:00 -0700 (PDT) From: vince.kaminski@enron.com To: grant.masson@enron.com Subject: Re: chapter 3 revisions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Vince J Kaminski X-To: Grant Masson X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Vincent_Kaminski_Jun2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Kaminski-V X-FileName: vkamins.nsf FYI Vince ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 10:04 AM --------------------------- "Chris Strickland" on 06/29/2000 05:24:12 AM Please respond to "Chris Strickland" To: , "VinceJKaminski" cc: "Les" , "Julie" Subject: Re: chapter 3 revisions Dear Vince and Grant, Please find attached our butchering of your work (only joking...). We've tied the chapter in with what has gone before and changed some of your notation so that it is consistent with ours. Vince; could you please send thru the footnotes referred to in the chapter at your convenience. Could you also please supply a full reference for Routledge, Seppi, Spatt (1999). Grant; I hope you don't mind we've called PDJD just JD (to fit in more with our work). Please also can you supply the last figure before you disappear! Do you want us to write the summary? Many thanks again for all your efforts. It's all looking good. Best regards. Chris. ----- Original Message ----- From: Grant Masson To: Chris Strickland Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:54 AM Subject: Re: chapter 3 revisions > > > > Chris: > > I can't decide if I should take your silence over the past several weeks to mean > that you are getting stuck into finishing up the book or you are just so > thoroughly disgusted with our work that you would like to wash your hands of us. > > I've been stuck on trying to get the last figure mentioned in the chapter into a > format that I like. The problem is the volatility found in the regressions is > on the order of several hundred percent, and so when I plot the historical data > next to a simulated curve over the course of the year, the simulated curve tends > to drift up or down stupidly both in the Jump diffusion and Garch+Jump diffusion > model. Any suggestions would be accepted with pleasure. I wonder if I should > skip the figure. It seems a pity to do so however, because otherwise the last > section comes off as a bit of an afterthought, and I would like to present a > practical example. Again any guidance would be appreciated. > > Anyway, I am sending you a somewhat improved draft now (minus only the last > figure), rather than sit on the whole thing while I stew on this bit, I hope > this will be useful to you. Because I am leaving for holidays at the end of the > week, I can guarantee you that you will have a final draft before then. > > Regards, > Grant. > (See attached file: cs260600.doc) > - ED_c03_volatility.zip