Message-ID: <1131597.1075851027122.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:24:00 -0700 (PDT) From: david.parquet@enron.com To: susan.mara@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, christopher.calger@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com Subject: LT Contracts: A History of Inaction by the CPUC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: David Parquet X-To: Susan J Mara, Jeff Dasovich, Tim Belden, Christopher F Calger, Sandra McCubbin, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Oct2001_2\Notes Folders\Attachments X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf Can we get any traction in supporting this? The premise is obviously preaching to the choir, and we (as I am sure others do as well) have a string of proposals starting with SDGEs in May or June that, if we melded their timing and their prices into the attached timeline would be very damaging to thinking people. However, are people really thinking, or has Davis and the reporters tainted the waters too badly? What would be the result that we would like to get from such an exposee? Do we really think that we could get some sympathy for returning to a market based structure? Or, would we be like the irritating kid who keeps saying "I told you so", so it does not matter if he was right or not? Are there any legal issues in revealing the prices? Does doing this through IEP help? (Note that the addition of prices could not be done, I do not think, without naming companies, so we would be there, partially revealed.) My vote: if it does not hurt us (competitively, PR, etc.), if it is legal, and especially if it can help make even a small amout of progress towards a market based structure, I would do it. Of course, we could not go anymore to restaurants near the CPUC...... I am out of town for the rest of the week, so I will leave the decision to you guys. Whatever you decide, is OK. PS - At the very least, we should feed our own proposals and their prices into this timeline. Privately, we could show it to various parties on a case by case basis to advance our cause. Just think about it... what if SDGE had accepted our (and others) May/June proposals for 5.5 cents.....?) ----- Forwarded by David Parquet/SF/ECT on 04/24/2001 04:59 PM ----- Jean Munoz 04/24/2001 12:56 PM To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" , "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" , "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" , "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'" , "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'" , "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'" , "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)" , "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" , "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" , "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" , "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" , "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" , "'John Larrea (E-mail)'" , "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'" , "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" , "'kent Palmerton (E-mail)'" , "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" , "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)" , "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'" , "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'" , "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'" , "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'" , "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'" , "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'" , "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" , "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" , "'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'" , "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'" , "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" , "Tom Williams (E-mail)" , "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" , "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'" , "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'" , "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" , "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'" , "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'" , "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'" , "'David Parquet'" , "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" , "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'" , "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" , "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" , "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" , "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" , "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'" , "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)" , "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" , "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" , "'Jim Willey (E-mail)'" , "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'" , "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'" , "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" , "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" , "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" , "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'" , "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" , "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'" , "'Paula Soos'" , "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'" , "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)" , "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'" , "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" , "'Steve Iliff'" , "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'" , "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" , "'William Hall (E-mail)'" , , , , , , , , , Katie Kaplan , , , , cc: Subject: LT Contracts: A History of Inaction by the CPUC Attached is a history of inaction by the CPUC in regards to long-term contracts. We are graphically portraying this as a timeline, incorporating the quotes. We would like to also incorporate any public long-term contract offers IEP members made that utilities were not able to enter into because of the CPUC. ?This will once again help reinforce that IEP members are part of the solution. ? Please forward this information, or any other comments, to me or Katie by 8am PST, Thursday April 26. Please call if you have any questions. Thanks, Jean -- Jean Munoz McNally Temple Associates, Inc. 916-447-8186 916-447-6326 (fx) - Long Term Contract Timeline