Message-ID: <16341020.1075846340928.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 01:41:00 -0700 (PDT) From: jeffrey.keeler@enron.com To: michael.terraso@enron.com, marc.phillips@enron.com, mary.schoen@enron.com, stacey.bolton@enron.com, susan.worthen@enron.com, henry.van@enron.com, gus.eghneim@enron.com, david.ronkainen@enron.com, donnie.willmann@enron.com, robert.moss@enron.com, frank.smith@enron.com, david.nutt@enron.com, bruce.stram@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, heather.mitchell@enron.com, sean.holmes@enron.com, john.shafer@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com, bret.reich@enron.com, kevin.presto@enron.com, edward.baughman@enron.com, mark.davis@enron.com, doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com, rogers.herndon@enron.com, george.hopley@enron.com, john.kinser@enron.com, nicole.la@enron.com, john.llodra@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com, john.suarez@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com, dave.kellermeyer@enron.com, jeffrey.keenan@enron.com, fred.mitro@enron.com, clay.spears@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com, scott.healy@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com, daniel.reck@enron.com, kevin.mcgowan@enron.com, matthew.goering@enron.com, john.massey@enron.com, vince.middleton@enron.com, scott.affelt@enron.com, mark.driscoll@enron.com, kenneth.lovejoy@enron.com, molly.sample@enron.com, hap.boyd@enron.com, wayne_lei@pgn.com, bruce_trout@pgn.com, dennis_norton@pgn.com, terry_worrell@pgn.com, scott.bolton@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, cynthia.sandherr@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, rob.bradley@enron.com, janine.migden@enron.com, steve.montovano@enron.com, barbara.hueter@enron.com, susan.landwehr@enron.com, daniel.allegretti@enron.com, howard.fromer@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, becky.merola@enron.com, frank.rishe@enron.com, lisa.yoho@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com Subject: NOx language in Senate Appropriations Legislation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jeffrey Keeler X-To: Michael Terraso, Marc Phillips, Mary Schoen, Stacey Bolton, Susan Worthen, Henry Van, Gus Eghneim, David Ronkainen, Donnie Willmann, Robert N Moss, Frank Smith, David Nutt, Bruce N Stram, Peggy Mahoney, Heather Mitchell, Sean A Holmes, John Shafer, William Kendrick, Louis Soldano, Bret Reich, Kevin M Presto, Edward D Baughman, Mark Dana Davis, Doug Gilbert-Smith, Lloyd Will, Rogers Herndon, George Hopley, John Kinser, Nicole La, John Llodra, Christi L Nicolay, Doug Sewell, John D Suarez, Mike J Miller@ECT, Ben Jacoby, Dave Kellermeyer, Jeffrey Keenan, Fred Mitro, Clay Spears, David Parquet, Scott Healy, Janel Guerrero, Daniel Reck, George McClellan@ECT, Kevin McGowan, Matthew Goering, John Massey, Vince Middleton, Scott Affelt, Mark Driscoll, Kenneth Lovejoy, Molly Sample, Hap Boyd, Wayne_Lei@pgn.com, Bruce_Trout@pgn.com, Dennis_Norton@pgn.com, Terry_Worrell@pgn.com, Scott Bolton, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, Cynthia Sandherr, Mark Palmer, Rob Bradley, Janine Migden, Steve Montovano, Barbara A Hueter, Susan M Landwehr, Daniel Allegretti, Howard Fromer, James D Steffes, Becky L Merola, Frank Rishe, Lisa Yoho, Joe Hartsoe, Sarah Novosel X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Environmental issues X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf Yesterday, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved VA/HUD/Independent Agencies appropriations bill (which funds EPA) and included legislative language stating that EPA should harmonize the NOx SIP and 126 deadlines for SIP submission and compliance. As you may recall, under the NOx SIP Call the courts have required states to submit SIPs to EPA by October 31, 2000, and recently moved the deadline for sources to comply with the state plans to May 2004. While the Section 126 rule will be litigated this fall, the courts have not moved the deadline for sources to comply with this federal NOx regulation from May of 2003. Industry supporters of this language are optimistic that this legislative language increases the chances that the SIP Call and 126 rules will be harmonized. If the language passes, it will have the force of law -- depending on how forceful the final language is, EPA may be compelled to harmonize the laws. On the other hand, this also increases the visibility of the language and could increase opposition to its inclusion in the appropriations bill as the House/Senate Conference Committee considers the bill. The language was not in the House version of the bill, and the Administration could weigh in with a veto threat that could scare off Senate negotiators in the end. This would be a significant development in NOx regulation, in that if this language becomes law, we would have more certainty that generation sources would not likely need to comply with NOx regulations until May 2004. Right now, industry still faces a May 2003 deadline for compliance with the 126 petitions, unless the litigation or this legislation changes things. We will keep you posted as developments occur.