Message-ID: <24166776.1075848251859.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT) From: steven.kean@enron.com To: steven.kean@enron.com Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steven J Kean X-To: Steven J Kean X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_June2001_5\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/16/2001 01:43 PM --------------------------- Steven J Kean 04/15/2001 08:02 PM To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan Thanks for taking the lead on this. Note Tim's question about handicapping the liklihood of approval. Prices will move in the West based on these odds. We need to have a better view than anyone else. Ray Alvarez 04/13/2001 01:19 PM To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan Tim, although there's always a "chance" my impression is that the FERC won't buy the ban on exports, as this would appear to run afoul of the Commerce Clause and certainly goes counter to everything that FERC hopes to accomplish with their own Order 888 and 2000 initiatives. I am less certain about the direction FERC will go on pricing, since even the staff has recognized stumbling blocks in their own recommendation and offers possible variants. The ISO has not submitted revised tariff sheets for approval yet, so it is unlikely they would try to implement their own plan in the near term. If they try to do so without FERC approval, possible legal avenues might include the filing of a complaint at FERC, asking for fast track processing (this "fast" is measured in weeks, not days) and/or seeking injunctive relief in court (faster), which can be hard to obtain but not impossible, depending entirely on the circumstances. Will keep you posted if I learn anything new on this. Ray James D Steffes 04/12/2001 11:21 PM To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan Ray -- Can you please take the lead in responding to Tim re: FERC v. state actions? Sue -- Any info on whether the ISO would do this unilaterally? Jim To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: ISO Market Stabilization Plan The recent plan filed at FERC is horrible. The two most aggregious parts are the cost based standing bids and the ban on exports. I know that we are commenting on this proposal. I am also looking for intellegence on whether the ISO proposal has any chance of getting approved by FERC. If it is not approved by FERC, what can the Californians do? California has ignored FERC before. If they attempt to unilaterally implement changes what is the likelihood that the Feds step in to intervene? If you hear anything on this matter please keep me posted. The proposed plan will have a huge impact on the California market and we need as much advance notice as possible.