Message-ID: <4803893.1075846384063.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 03:18:00 -0700 (PDT) From: steven.kean@enron.com To: rob.bradley@enron.com Subject: Enron's natural gas policy positions Cc: jeannie.mandelker@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: jeannie.mandelker@enron.com X-From: Steven J Kean X-To: Rob Bradley X-cc: Jeannie Mandelker X-bcc: X-Folder: \Steven_Kean_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: KEAN-S X-FileName: skean.nsf coule you get Jeannie copies of the slides or other write ups you have on this. Jeannie -- I don't know how far it is prudent to take a position on this as a co. It has already become a key battleground (garnering some discussion in the Gore-Lieberman debate). I think we stay away from it as a co., but we at least ought to put the information in front of anyone we are asking to do an oped so that they can make a reasoned judgement. ----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:18 AM ----- Jeannie Mandelker@ECT 10/13/2000 08:19 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Enron's natural gas policy positions Hi -- I'm working on a dual gas/power op-ed (the former DeLay op-ed). I have Enron's message points on higher gas prices, but I wondered if we were taking a position on expanding natural gas exploration as Gov. Bush proposes -- onto more federal lands, particularly in Alaska. I read somewhere that 40% of potential US reserves are on federal lands. Thanks for your help, Jeannie