Message-ID: <18405154.1075840198015.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:49:22 -0800 (PST)
From: kam.keiser@enron.com
To: bryce.baxter@enron.com
Subject: RE: Questionable Deals
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Keiser, Kam </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KKEISER>
X-To: Baxter, Bryce </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bbaxter>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Keiser, Kam\Sent Items
X-Origin: KEISER-K
X-FileName: kam keiser 7-11-02.PST

Bryce,

These deals have been corrected.  The triggers and demand charges have been removed.  Deal #1005851 did have gas flow and I believe should still be settled unless someone says otherwise.

Thanks

Kam


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baxter, Bryce  
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 12:41 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam; Palmer, B. Scott; Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Questionable Deals

I am reviewing the accrual, and have found a number of deals so far that look like they were terminated, but the demand charges/triggers are still in Sitara.  Should these be zeroed out as well, or are we really supposed to bill them?  I haven't made it through the whole list, but here's what I've seen so far that I'm questioning.  Please let me know today if possible.  Also, if I've left anyone off that needs to see this, please let me know.  Thanks.
 << File: Accrual200112.xls >>