Message-ID: <5822128.1075840192433.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:46:20 -0800 (PST) From: kam.keiser@enron.com To: m.hall@enron.com Subject: RE: general update on DPR - ENA portion Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Keiser, Kam X-To: Hall, Bob M X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Keiser, Kam\Sent Items X-Origin: KEISER-K X-FileName: kam keiser 7-11-02.PST This was settled with Chris Abel last night. We have always reported our positions in contracts, they want to see it in BCF. We will be reporting it that way going forward. Kam -----Original Message----- From: Hall, Bob M Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:40 AM To: Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam Subject: FW: general update on DPR - ENA portion fill me in on the issue. do they just not believe your numbers/ call me bob -----Original Message----- From: Pearce, Barry Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:21 AM To: Wilson, Shona Cc: Abel, Chris; Hall, Bob M; McMichael Jr., Ed; Fallon, Jim Subject: RE: general update on DPR - ENA portion thanks break it by location/basis point - and time - at least we will be able to see the make up of the position b -----Original Message----- From: Wilson, Shona Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:04 PM To: Fallon, Jim; Pearce, Barry Cc: Abel, Chris; Hall, Bob M; McMichael Jr., Ed Subject: general update on DPR - ENA portion Dear Jim & Barry, We are getting info from gas and power. We do have an issue with the inception to date P&L (see Chris's memo), and I'm also a bit concerned with the accuracy gas position reported to us of 5500 (short). We've discussed it with Jeff's group and they have confirmed it, but it still seems a bit big to me. Well keep working. Best regards Shona Wilson Director, Global Risk Operations X39123