Message-ID: <3965361.1075853022372.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT) From: louise.kitchen@enron.com To: stephen.stock@enron.com Subject: RE: Budget Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kitchen, Louise X-To: Stock, Stephen X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \LKITCHEN (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: Kitchen-L X-FileName: LKITCHEN (Non-Privileged).pst I will - thanks -----Original Message----- From: Stock, Stephen Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:31 AM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: RE: Budget No, you are not wrong........ I was just offering to give you a more detailed account from an IT perspective, if you require it.... Why not just keep the offer in mind then, in case you need an IT explanation later? Steve -----Original Message----- From: Kitchen, Louise Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:25 AM To: Stock, Stephen Subject: RE: Budget I was sort of assuming Sally would bring this with her to the meeting. Am I wrong? -----Original Message----- From: Stock, Stephen Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:11 AM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: FW: Budget Louise, I'd like to re-issue the offer of giving you background on the project view of the budget, if you require it. ?? regards Steve -----Original Message----- From: Stock, Stephen Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 AM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: Budget Louise, I understand that you will shortly receive a first draft budget submission for ENA. I'm not sure what format you'll receive it in, but if its the standard format, it'll be difficult to pick out the project level estimates. I have access to the team/project level estimates, and would be happy to pull together a quick view that suits you. I was going to try to guess how you would like to see it, but I thought I'd better ask you first, ....it'll probably save me a lot of work! :) The thought was to give you a quick handle on whats "essential-keep the business running" stuff, and what would be great but we can struggle on without. Please remember this is supposed to be a quick heads-up, and not intended to replace any full explanation that will innevitably follow later. Some alternatives (obviously, feel free to suggest your own) 1. Capital Team Project 1 Name Description ENA $ Project 2 Name Description ENA $ Expense Project 1 Name Description ENA $ Project 2 Name Description ENA $ 2. Capital Team % Essential % Nice to Have Project 1 Name Description ENA $ 40% 60% Project 2 Name Description ENA $ 80% 20% Expense Project 1 Name Description ENA $ Project 2 Name Description ENA $ Please let me know what you would prefer, and I'll try to get you the view by the end of the day. regards Steve