Message-ID: <11880879.1075840958182.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 04:39:41 -0800 (PST) From: louise.kitchen@enron.com To: rob.milnthorp@enron.com Subject: RE: Headcount Latitude Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kitchen, Louise X-To: Milnthorp, Rob X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Kitchen, Louise\Sent Items X-Origin: KITCHEN-L X-FileName: louise kitchen 2-7-02.pst I think there are issues with this as essentially we are changing the business model - we need to hire into the areas we are lacking people asap in order to ensure we have coverage as much as possible. Will your people mopve to Houston? -----Original Message----- From: Milnthorp, Rob Sent: Mon 1/28/2002 5:00 PM To: Kitchen, Louise Cc: Subject: Headcount Latitude Louise, given the number of declines, is there any latitude in moving up the Canadian Headcount. I believe we cut very deep on the 1st go round. Specifically, there is a couple of analysts and one manager on the commercial side and on the non-commercial side we'd like to have at least one if not two admins for answering the phones (Admins are roughly U.S. $15K/annum and ours are extremely good). We still might come in under our initial headcount given the decline probabilities, but I would like to offer additional jobs asap as opposed to waiting for responses.