Message-ID: <892536.1075840964813.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:04:18 -0800 (PST) From: louise.kitchen@enron.com To: shawn.k.feeney@ssmb.com Subject: Here's who owns www.citienergy.com Cc: richard.a.stuckey@ssmb.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: richard.a.stuckey@ssmb.com X-From: Kitchen, Louise X-To: 'shawn.k.feeney@ssmb.com' X-cc: 'richard.a.stuckey@ssmb.com' X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Kitchen, Louise\Sent Items X-Origin: KITCHEN-L X-FileName: louise kitchen 2-7-02.pst Top of Form 1 & Enter amount (min $200.00) Bottom of Form 1 Whois Results for citienergy.com Registrant: SHRITECH CONSULTING, INC. P.O.BOX 2457 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91778 US Registrar: Dotster (http://www.dotster.com) Domain Name: citienergy.com Top of Form 2 & Enter amount (min $200.00) Bottom of Form 2 Created on: 21-DEC-01 Expires on: 21-DEC-02 Last Updated on: 21-DEC-01 Administrative Contact: SRIVASTAVA, K preetixs@netscape.net SHRITECH CONSULTING, INC. P.O.BOX 2457 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91778 US 2322022 Technical Contact: SRIVASTAVA, K preetixs@netscape.net SHRITECH CONSULTING, INC. P.O.BOX 2457 SAN GABRIEL, CA 91778 US 2322022 Domain servers in listed order: NS1.DOTSTERINC.COM 216.34.94.170 NS2.DOTSTERINC.COM 64.85.73.15 Register a domain name at www.dotster.com End of Whois Information Top of Form 3 Bottom of Form 3 Top of Form 4 & Enter amount (min $200.00) Bottom of Form 4 [Our News ] [Domain -----Original Message----- From: Kitchen, Louise Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:38 PM To: '"Stuckey, Richard A [FI]" @ENRON' Subject: RE: FW: SSMB lawyer's request EES - the ENA ones are still on hold. I really am not concerned about EES and retail. I spoke to Muller who was hesitant about providing load numbers as he thought it irrelevant. There is very little left to carve out. -----Original Message----- From: "Stuckey, Richard A [FI]" @ENRON Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:12 AM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: RE: FW: SSMB lawyer's request Louise Saw in the WSJ today that the judge allowed Enron to "end" 600-700 supply contracts. Is that EES? If so are they going to still be in business? I ask because of my question from yesterday re the annual load carve-out. Is there anything left to carve out?? Thanks Rick -----Original Message----- From: Kitchen, Louise [mailto:Louise.Kitchen@enron.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:11 AM To: "Flood, Scott L [GCO]" @ENRON Cc: Stuckey, Richard A [FI] Subject: RE: FW: SSMB lawyer's request The following documents are the two agreements which facilitate the online trading. These contracts govern the actual transaction process and are accepted the counterparty either in writing or electronically. Password Application - In writing Electronic Trading Agreement - Electronically These documents do not have any customer specific terms (eg credit etc) as they are not intended to govern the underlying commodity transactions, but simply the utiliszation of the website. The General Terms and Conditions will be issued to the known Buyer as they do have credit terms etc. Please let me, Dave Forster or Mark Taylor know if you would require further information. Louise <> <> > -----Original Message----- > From: "Flood, Scott L [GCO]" @ENRON > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 6:31 AM > To: Kitchen, Louise > Subject: Re: FW: SSMB lawyer's request > > Louise, thank you for your timeline. Is it envisioned the distribution of > the ETA on monday will include revised general terms and conditions or will > that be sent later ? Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kitchen, Louise > To: Flood, Scott L [GCO] > CC: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) ; Forster, David > ; Webb, Jay > Sent: Thu Jan 03 12:55:24 2002 > Subject: FW: SSMB lawyer's request > > > > Scott > > > > Mark Taylor forwarded me your request, I thought it may be helpful to > introduce myself and Dave Forster, Dave is the Vice President in charge of > the commercial/operational aspects of EnronOnline (that was!). We do have a > relaunch plan in place which highlights critical timings which need to be > met over the next weeks. I hope this will assist you. As Mark probably > already informed you we are taking the opportunity to update the PA and ETA. > Under the timescale we do plan to have these with you today. > > > > Should Citigroup be the winning bidder, we are currently planning to use > the website name "citigroupenergy.com, 'ssmbenergy.com' or 'ssbenergy.com'. > If you intend to give us one of your own doamine names please let us know. > > > > If you have any questions on the timetable, please do not hesitate to > contact Dave or myself, or on the form of the agreements Mark Taylor. > > > > Thanks > > > > Louise > > > > Louise Kitchen > > Chief Operating Officer > > Enron Americas > > Tel: 713 853 3488 > > Fax: 713 646 2308 > > > > > > > > > <> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:11 AM > > To: Kitchen, Louise > > Subject: SSMB lawyer's request > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Flood, Scott L [GCO]" @ENRON > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:46 AM > > To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) > > Subject: electronic trading > > > > Mark, > > Thanks for the call yesterday . It was very helpful. Can you send me a > copy > > of the electronic trading and pass word application agreements ? Thanks > > > ********************************************************************** > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and > may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the > intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply > to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all > copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not > intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be> > relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. > Thank you. > **********************************************************************