Message-ID: <6890787.1075857672924.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:40:18 -0700 (PDT) From: kishkill@enron.com To: john.lavorato@enron.com Subject: Internal Trade and P&L Cc: remi.collonges@enron.com, orlando.gonzalez@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: remi.collonges@enron.com, orlando.gonzalez@enron.com X-From: Kishkill, Joe X-To: Lavorato, John X-cc: es Colwell/HOU/ECT@ENRON , Collonges, Remi , Gonzalez, Orlando X-bcc: X-Folder: \jlavora\Deleted Items X-Origin: Lavorado-J X-FileName: jlavora.pst John, Wes called me and told me about your desire to remove the 25 MW Brazil trade from the "books" retroactively. The reason given was tax implications. I accepted the tax need at face value and want to do what is right for the company. However, we (Remi and I) would like to talk to you about the P&L implications of doing this. I assume we keep the P&L on the internal scorecard but need to work out the details on how this gets reflected. Thanks, Kish