Message-ID: <1403466.1075857692252.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 05:30:40 -0700 (PDT) From: lavorato@enron.com To: rogers.herndon@enron.com Subject: RE: EES Gas Desk and New Buiding Move Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Lavorato, John X-To: Herndon, Rogers X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \jlavora\Sent Items X-Origin: Lavorado-J X-FileName: jlavora.pst We should have room on 6. Check and see if Arnold has redone the floor plan. You need to keep this away from Fred's group. I would suggest locating near Gas Structuring. Ed McMichael, the head of gas structuring can be a big help. -----Original Message----- From: Herndon, Rogers Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:38 PM To: Lavorato, John Cc: Presto, Kevin Subject: EES Gas Desk and New Buiding Move John - What are your thought s on location of EES' Gas desk - current head count = 47. FYI, we just assigned Jim Homco to this group to address commercial and operational issues. Is there any space on 6 with ENA's Gas desk? We have had discussions lately re: the many areas where potential integration efficiencies could be achieved, such as having a retail fixed price rep sit on Lagrosta's desk to achieve more timely and accurate prices for non-swap products. We could fit the group on 5, but the functional benefit just isn't there. Also, does Sally Beck's group provide the confirms/contract/risk services for ENA's gas desk as it does for ENA Power? If so, shouldn't Sally be involved in retail? These guys are really behind in this respect and it is a big factor in ongoing losses and commercial imperfections. Rogers