Message-ID: <20170515.1075858264509.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 01:45:00 -0800 (PST)
From: phillip.love@enron.com
To: jeffrey.gossett@enron.com
Subject: Re: Credit Report
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Phillip M Love
X-To: Jeffrey C Gossett
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Phillip_Love_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Love-P
X-FileName: plove.nsf

Here was my original response to her.  Joe Hunter is fine with me.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 
09:43 AM ---------------------------


Phillip M Love
01/22/2001 09:39 AM
To: Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David 
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Credit Report  

I have a few concerns about this.  We are suppossed to be the only point of 
contact for changes in tagg.  This is an internal control issue that leaves 
all responsibility for errors in tagg with risk.  If other people are 
touching deals in tagg, any errors will then have to be investigated further 
and thus take longer to resolve.

I guess my main question for you is, does a problem exist in the current 
system?  Is risk not addressing your issues and needs on a timely basis?  If 
so, we need to readdress that issue and resolve it in a more timely manner.

Please let me know if the others disagree with me.

Thanks.
PL