Message-ID: <23294476.1075858252123.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 03:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: chuck.ames@enron.com
To: phillip.love@enron.com
Subject: FT Intra Ontario P&L for April 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Chuck Ames
X-To: Phillip M Love
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Phillip_Love_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Love-P
X-FileName: plove.nsf

What the hell is this?



---------------------- Forwarded by Chuck Ames/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 10:24=
=20
AM ---------------------------
From: Rachel Crowell/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 09:12 AM
To: Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: FT Intra Ontario P&L for April 2001

Chuck,
=01;
The loss shown in the report page of the FT Intra Ontario file located unde=
r=20
the firmtrad directory is $1,086M for the month of April 2001.=01; However,=
=20
the=01;loss shown for that book on the final 04/30 Natural Gas P&L is $663M=
.=01;=20
The difference is the Schedule E item reflected in Roll-1 for=01;prior mont=
h=20
adjustments (gas daily variances per Canada and Texas deal QH9312.1).=01; F=
rom=20
an outside view it seems that the links in the NGP&L were updated before th=
e=20
pma was recorded in the file.=01; Can you confirm this, or is there another=
=20
reason for the different p&l values?=01;=20
=01;
Since the income numbers should be the same, would it be possible to "catch=
=20
up" the value in May's NGP&L to match what has been recorded in the FT Intr=
a=20
Ontaio book file on a cumulative basis?=01; Or do you have an another sugge=
stion=20
to get the life to date values correct between the 2 sources?
=01;
Best regards,
=01;
Rachel
=01;
=01;
=01;