Message-ID: <27438594.1075858259937.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 06:09:00 -0800 (PST)
From: phillip.love@enron.com
To: cathy.sprowls@enron.com
Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Phillip M Love
X-To: Cathy Sprowls
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Phillip_Love_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Love-P
X-FileName: plove.nsf

We will take this variance to the desk then.
PL



   
	
	
	From:  Cathy Sprowls                           02/16/2001 01:31 PM
	

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules


Ok, Phillip, here's the story I was given by Jim Little, you tell me if it 
makes sense.  In January this liquidation was out of the intra-month book.  
Sometime betwen January and August, the liquidation was changed to the  
FTbook and we don't liquidate out of the FT book, so the expected offset 
didn't happen.


---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 01:29 
PM ---------------------------


Phillip M Love
02/16/2001 01:10 PM
To: Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules  

I am curious why N70012.Q is a variance in 0001 and N70012.R is not a 
variance in 0008.  If you look in the two fred files, 0001 has the liq 
flashed and not in the GL, and in 0008 the liquidation is in flash and the 
GL.  The counterparties in both are the same.  Jim needs to revise 0001 
file.  Shout with any questions.  Thanks.
PL