Message-ID: <13904658.1075841232928.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 06:31:54 -0800 (PST) From: shannon.mcpearson@enron.com To: errol.mclaughlin@enron.com Subject: RE: PG Book Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: McPearson, Shannon X-To: McLaughlin Jr., Errol X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - McLaughlin Jr., Errol\Deleted Items X-Origin: MCLAUGHLIN-E X-FileName: erol mclaughlin 6-26-02.PST This is taking more research than we thought. I am getting some post ID's unarchived and pulling max exposure detail out of archives. So, we may not have a resolution until next close. I will let you know. -----Original Message----- From: McLaughlin Jr., Errol Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:37 AM To: McPearson, Shannon Subject: RE: PG Book This looks like the macro problem we talked about. Let me know what I need to do to fix. Thanks, Errol, X5-8274 -----Original Message----- From: McPearson, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:38 PM To: McLaughlin Jr., Errol Subject: PG Book Errol, Is a Macro problem your final answer on this?? I need an answer on this. If the beginning balances were changed in error, please let me know this so I can determine what I need to do to fix this variance. Again, this change did not affect your P&L. In the January 2001 PG book DPR, for the EOL Gas Daily Roll, you reduced your beginning Gross Balance for January by $9,066,220 and you increased your beginning Liquidated Balance for January by $9,066,220. So, the EOL Gas Daily Roll stayed flat in total and did not cause a problem P&L wise. However, this amount is falling out on my reconciliation for January. Could you please tell me what deal or deals were liquidated for $9,066,220, which in turn caused a reduction in your MTM?? We are concerned that these may be third party deals that Financial Settlements are not aware of. Thanks!! Shannon McPearson Enron North America 713-853-5944 Shannon.McPearson@enron.com