Message-ID: <33401415.1075851972689.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:39:00 -0700 (PDT) From: rcarroll@bracepatt.com To: ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com, acomnes@enron.com, dfulton@enron.com, jsteffe@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, robert.frank@enron.com, rsanders@enron.com, rshapiro@enron.com, smara@enron.com, snovose@enron.com Subject: Fwd: Puget has Pulled the Plug on its Price Cap Petition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "Ronald Carroll" X-To: , , , , , , , , , , X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Richard_Shapiro_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: SHAPIRO-R X-FileName: rshapiro.nsf This is potentially important. If FERC were to grant Puget's request to dismiss and withdraw its complaint, it could undercut the suggestion made to Ray A. by a FERC staffer at a recent meeting that FERC could potentially order WSCC refunds prior to the July 2, 2001 refund effective date established in the June 19 Order (which FERC could attempt to do by revising its previous dismissal of Puget's complaint on rehearing, which is pending.) My guess is that FERC will not wish to give up the leverage that it has on this front, and thus will sit on Puget's motion to withdrawal for the time being while the settlement efforts are ongoing. Ron Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:46:22 -0400 From: "Tracey Bradley" To: "Paul Fox" Subject: Puget has Pulled the Plug on its Price Cap Petition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_267C5593.3C5D310B" Attached is Puget's 06/22/2001Motion to dismiss & notice of withdrawal of pleadings of Puget Sound Energy, Inc re all jurisdictional sellers of energy and/or capacity at wholesale into electric energy and/or capacity markets in the Pacific Northwest etc, EL01-10. FERC acceptance of this withdrawal would resolve the concern about the potential for an earlier refund effective date for prices charged in the WSCC. - puget-el01-10 withdrawal.tiff