Message-ID: <19097173.1075851973963.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com Subject: DRAFT Core/Noncore Language Delivered Today to Hertzberg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: Richard Shapiro, skean@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne, Harry Kingerski, Alan Comnes, Paul Kaufman, Susan J Mara, Linda Robertson, Michael Tribolet X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Richard_Shapiro_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: SHAPIRO-R X-FileName: rshapiro.nsf FYI. Please keep confidential until further notice. Important to note that this was delivered with the understanding that NO ONE has agreed to the specific language. It was a quick turn around (at Hertzberg's request) to get the original, negotiated agreement into Legislative language (i.e., Martian) as soon as possible so that Hertzberg could try to move on it in the Legislature as soon as possible. In addition, the Commission is likely to come out with its proposed "rate agreement" sometime this week, and is likely to release DWR's "revenue requirement" next week. I heard from the Gov's financial advisor that Edison and DWR EACH want 2 cents out of the PUC's recent 3 cent rate increase. It's going to get very interesting from here. Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/10/2001 04:11 PM ----- "Simpson, Rick" 07/10/2001 04:12 PM To: "'dhunter@s-k-w.com'" , "Simpson, Rick" cc: "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'" , "'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'" , "'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'" , "'John Fielder (E-mail)'" , Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com, "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'" , "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" , "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'" , "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'" , "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'" , "'John White (E-mail)'" , Ann.Cohn@sce.com, "Mike Kahl (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Final Legislative Language You all are awesome. Many thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:dhunter@s-k-w.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:56 PM To: Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov Cc: 'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'; 'Dominic DiMare (E-mail)'; 'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'John Fielder (E-mail)'; Gary.Schoonyan@sce.com; 'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'; 'John White (E-mail)'; Ann.Cohn@sce.com; Mike Kahl (E-mail) Subject: Final Legislative Language Rick- Attached please find our final draft of legislative language per your request. We are ready and willing to draft other sections or language as needed by you or the Speaker. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the draft. Please note there are disagreements over two sections of language and they are so marked. FYI - I will be sending this document out to the entire Working Group for their information. Thank you, Delaney - FINAL Legislative Language.doc