Message-ID: <8423266.1075861819451.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 05:24:00 -0800 (PST) From: credit <.williams@enron.com> To: houston <.ward@enron.com>, gerald.nemec@enron.com, e..dickson@enron.com Subject: RE: Frito Lay Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Williams, Jason R (Credit) X-To: Ward, Kim S (Houston) , Nemec, Gerald , Dickson, Stacy E. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \KWARD (Non-Privileged)\Ward, Kim S (Houston)\Frito Lay X-Origin: Ward-K X-FileName: KWARD (Non-Privileged).pst Stacy and Gerald - There are no credit concerns with respect to Frito-Lay, but I have a question surrounding the "Adequate Assurances" language. In the "Special Provisions" document below, Item 6 states "When reasonable grounds for insecurity of payment or title to the Gas arise". Does this issue of "title to the Gas" suggest that the gas SUPPLIER might be forced to post adequate assurance? As you know, we are managing capital very carefully right now, and any provisions that might give a counterparty legal right to call for collateral should be negotiated out of contracts. Please let me know what you think about this issue. Thanks, JRW -----Original Message----- From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:45 PM To: Nemec, Gerald; Dickson, Stacy E.; Williams, Jason R (Credit) Subject: Frito Lay Gerald & Stacy, I didn't which of you would have the most time to deal with this, but, I am responding to an RFP for provide gas to several Frito Lay plants in California for the term Dec, 2001 through October, 2003. It will be a full-requirments transaction whereby we manage the imbalance and transportation. Based on the request, they would like to execute a GISB with special provisions that I have attached. I have also included a confirmation form they would like to use to confirm the transaction for each of their facilities. ALL REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS TO THIS CONTRACT FORM MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE RFP RESPONSE which will be emailed to them by noon central time on Thursday, Nov. 15. Sorry for the rush, I just received the RFP yesterday and didn't realize this was a stipulation until just now. No modifications indicates that the proposed language is acceptable. I am also attaching the RFP itself. Please let me know if you have any questions. this will be a pretty standard full-requirements offer. Please let me know if you have any questions or what I can do to help. Thanks, Kim << File: Frito Lay GISB Spec Prov2.doc >> << File: FritoLayRFP-CA-2nd Round2.doc >> << File: GISB EXHIBIT A.doc >>