Message-ID: <27331331.1075852038671.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 11:13:00 -0800 (PST)
From: valarie.sabo@enron.com
To: tim.belden@enron.com, stacey.white@enron.com
Subject: reminder re: mapping COB S/N and NOB S/N
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Valarie Sabo
X-To: Tim Belden, Stacey W White
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sally_White_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: WHITE-S
X-FileName: swhite.nsf

I should mention that Basis  pt. 22 is off of R8


---------------------- Forwarded by Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 09:20 
PM ---------------------------
From: Valarie Sabo on 03/08/2001 07:10 PM
To: Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: reminder re: mapping COB S/N and NOB S/N

I think we all decided that COB S/N and NOB S/N should become a basis point 
unto themselves.  Remapping the S/N  has not been thoroughly explored 
regarding implications to existing deals and has not been re-mapped in table 
edit nor has a basis point been created.  Currently COB S/N and COB N/S = R8; 
and NOB S/N = Basis Pt #22 which is also what NOB N/S is mapped as.  We'll 
probably only appreciate the revaluation on a shoulder month basis, but I 
believe it is material.