Message-ID: <27212963.1075855709071.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:09:00 -0800 (PST)
From: phillip.allen@enron.com
To: frank.ermis@enron.com
Subject: California Gas Demand Growth
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Phillip K Allen
X-To: Frank Ermis
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Phillip_Allen_June2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Allen-P
X-FileName: pallen.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 
11:09 AM ---------------------------
From: Mark Whitt@ENRON on 02/09/2001 03:38 PM MST
Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
To: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike 
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: California Gas Demand Growth

This should probably be researched further.  If they can really build this 
many plants it could have a huge impact on the Cal border basis.  Obviously 
it is dependent on what capacity is added on Kern, PGT and TW but it is hard 
to envision enough subscriptions to meet this demand.  Even if it is 
subscribed it will take 18 months to 2 years to build new pipe therefore the 
El Paso 1.2 Bcf/d could be even more valuable.


Mark


----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 03:04 PM -----

	Tyrell Harrison@ECT
	Sent by: Tyrell Harrison@ECT
	02/09/2001 09:26 AM
		 
		 To: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul T 
Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie 
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: California Gas Demand Growth




If you wish to run sensitivities to heat rate and daily dispatch,  I have 
attached the spreadsheet below.


Tyrell
303 575 6478