Message-ID: <32169724.1075857608985.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:36:00 -0800 (PST)
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: jennifer.fraser@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: LNG Weekly Update
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: John Arnold
X-To: Jennifer Fraser
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \John_Arnold_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Arnold-J
X-FileName: Jarnold.nsf

Looks good.  certainly an area we need more focus on.  Obviously the most 
important aspect of lng is how much gas is coming in, what is that relative 
to last year, and what new capacity is coming longer term.  
As an aside, nat gas trades as a funciton of the storage spread to last year 
and five year averages.  It would be very useful if all fundamental analysis 
were geared the same way.  The fact that lng shipments are x this week is 
meaningless.  the fact that they are y delta of last year is extremely 
useful.  if you noticed in the fundies meeting, i was trying to move 
discussion that way.  what's switching vis a vis last year.   whats 
production relative to last year.  it simplifies the fundamental analysis.


From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/12/2001 05:46 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: FW: LNG Weekly Update



An initial effort--please comment