Message-ID: <15264908.1075852692948.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT) From: l..nowlan@enron.com To: john.arnold@enron.com Subject: RE: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Nowlan Jr., John L. X-To: Arnold, John X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JARNOLD (Non-Privileged)\Arnold, John\Deleted Items X-Origin: Arnold-J X-FileName: JARNOLD (Non-Privileged).pst agree, with the additional caveat that if he was half way decent he would have lasted longer at credit lyon or bp . think he leveraged a decent crt experience into a couple of jobs where he failed. tks for taking the time. -----Original Message----- From: Arnold, John Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 6:37 PM To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Nowlan Jr., John L. Subject: Not so impressed with David goldman. For a guy who has worked in derivatives for 10 years, couldnt answer some simple questions. Very poor financial derivatives knowledge even though he worked at CRT for a long time and a Lyonnais for a while. The only value I see in him is that he worked at BP for a while and might have some knowledge as to how they work.