Message-ID: <4031527.1075854774147.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 01:29:00 -0800 (PST)
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: brian.hoskins@enron.com
Subject: Re:
Cc: luis.mena@enron.com, timothy.blanchard@enron.com, matthew.lenhart@enron.com, 
	chad.landry@enron.com, zachary.mccarroll@enron.com, 
	james.wininger@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: luis.mena@enron.com, timothy.blanchard@enron.com, matthew.lenhart@enron.com, 
	chad.landry@enron.com, zachary.mccarroll@enron.com, 
	james.wininger@enron.com
X-From: Eric Bass
X-To: Brian Hoskins
X-cc: Luis Mena, Timothy Blanchard, Matthew Lenhart, Chad Landry, Zachary McCarroll, James Wininger
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Eric_Bass_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Bass-E
X-FileName: ebass.nsf

It sounds like someone is working hard and making the company lots of $.

Where the hell do you come up with this shit?




BRIAN HOSKINS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/20/2001 09:18 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@ENRON, Timothy 
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Zachary McCarroll/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James 
Wininger/NA/Enron
cc:  
Subject: 



Box Score Banter
The following question and statistical numbers come via J.C. Corrigan of 
Richmond, Va.

He asks:

"Which conference is best? Pac -0? ACC? SEC? Big 10? Big 12? Big East? Using 
the RPI, I evaluated the top eight teams in each conference (ACC is the 
smallest in terms of members, and I threw out their "Russian judge" team). 
If you were to add these individual team RPI up, the least sum would 
indicate the greatest depth:

Big Ten, 178; SEC, 194; Big East, 246; Big 12, 278; ACC, 369; Pac-10, 382.

Now some may argue that you should not count the bottom teams, since half 
are forced into a losing record. Others say, only one team can win, so why 
concern yourself with the bottom feeders? To refute that, here's what the 
sums look like using only the top four teams from each conference:

SEC, 40; Pac-10, 41; ACC, 48; Big Ten, 49; Big East, 66; Big 12, 69.

If indeed each conference has their bottom feeders, then we want to make 
sure there are no "gimmies" for those teams on top. So what's the RPI rating 
of the lowest team in each conference?

SEC, 103 (LSU); Big Ten, 135 (Northwestern); Big 12, 157 (Texas Tech); Big 
East, 167 (Virginia Tech); ACC, 168 (Clemson) Pac-10, 173 (Washington State)

Others will argue that we should include each team and then "normalize" 
based on the number of teams per conference. This will also account for the 
small differences between teams and reward second-tier team strength. Here 
are the conferences with their average RPI and median RPI.

SEC (39.1, 38.5), Big Ten (39.4, 29.0), Big East (45.2, 49.0), ACC (59.7, 
35.0), Big 12 (66.7, 47.0), Pac-10 (70.8, 55.0).

This data clearly shows how "top heavy" the ACC, Big 12 and Pac-10 are. But 
who's the best? When evaluating where each conference ranks across the these 
five categories:

SEC: 2-1-1-1-3 8

Big Ten: 1-4-2-2-1 10

Big East: 1-5-4-3-4 17

ACC: 5-3-5-4-2 19

Big 12: 4-6-3-5-4 22

Pac-10: 6-2-6-6-6 26

The SEC has a slight edge over the Big Ten, but some may say the RPI is 
biased. So how would these numbers hold up using the Sugaring Ratings?

SEC: 10

Big 10: 11

ACC: 12

Big 12: 20

Pac-10: 22

Big East: 29

Personally, I think the RPI is a little more accurate. Hope you found this 
interesting in my attempt to answer the oldest question in the NCAA book. 
Ideally, I would like to include head-to-head competition and run these 
numbers, but I'm an amateur and I don't that much time on my hands."
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com