Message-ID: <15823376.1075862307518.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:53:31 -0800 (PST) From: barry.pearce@enron.com To: sally.beck@enron.com Subject: Foward looking... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Pearce, Barry X-To: Beck, Sally X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SBECK (Non-Privileged)\Beck, Sally\Inbox X-Origin: Beck-S X-FileName: SBECK (Non-Privileged).pst given that we (ENE) are going to undoubtedly be undergoing a whole bunch of change in the next months - it may be worth thinking about how Energy Ops would look 'post-change'... i guess i'm thinking along the lines of one central Energy Ops core - with as many centralized functions as possible - running off as many centralized systems as possible - like a bank model - a central processing facility (Houston) - with regional/product 'swat teams' in each/any business units - really just Risk Admin folks and Deal Capture - front end commercial folks may ask this anyway - especially as a cost saving opportunity - it might be good to suggest it/plan for it in advance.....at least get some thoughts together just thinking out loud b