Message-ID: <33094892.1075845075875.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:37:29 -0700 (PDT) From: sally.beck@enron.com To: greg.piper@enron.com Subject: RE: Mid and Back Office Discussion with Calpine Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Beck, Sally X-To: Piper, Greg X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Beck, Sally\Beck, Sally\Sent Items X-Origin: BECK-S X-FileName: Beck, Sally.pst Informational for me, or do you want me to attend? If you don't want me to attend, would you like for me to review the presentation that you plan to give? --Sally -----Original Message----- From: Piper, Greg Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:54 AM To: 'Paul Posoli @ENRON' Subject: RE: Mid and Back Office Discussion with Calpine We will come to your office on June 5th at 4 PM. We will give you some powerpoint on what we see happening in the industry, what it means for transaction counts, a little on how we process, what we have done for others, how it might work, etc. Thanks. GP -----Original Message----- From: Paul Posoli @ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Paul+20Posoli+20+3Cpaulp+40calpine+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:28 AM To: Piper, Greg Subject: RE: Mid and Back Office Discussion The afternoon of the 5th works good for us. We'll be in San Jose on the 4th. How does 4:00 work for you? Let me know. Paul -----Original Message----- From: Greg.Piper@enron.com [mailto:Greg.Piper@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:21 AM To: paulp@calpine.com Subject: RE: Mid and Back Office Discussion Is June 4th or 5th better? GP -----Original Message----- From: Paul Posoli @ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Paul+20Posoli+20+3Cpaulp+40calpine+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON .com] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 7:42 PM To: Piper, Greg Subject: RE: Mid and Back Office Discussion Sounds good. My calendar looks like this: Week of 21st - in all week 28th - out Tuesday - Thursday 4th - In until Thursday - leaving Thursday for a week on vacation Let me know what dates work for you and I'll gather the necessary people. Beers sound great. Paul -----Original Message----- From: Piper, Greg [mailto:Greg.Piper@ENRON.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 7:05 PM To: paulp@calpine.com Subject: Mid and Back Office Discussion Paul, Thanks for lunch a few weeks ago. Sounds like you have a ton of work and responsibility these days. Also, thanks for working with Gros on CommodityLogic. It is a great application that I think will help our industry better manage the ever increasing transaction flow. In addition to CommodityLogic, and as a follow-up to our lunch, I would like to come over in a few weeks and sit down and show you and your team what we mean by "outsourcing" your mid and back office functions to our "ProsessCo/ServiceCo." I think we have identified what types of services we could offer and under what type of arrangements. Basically, you have risk reporting, general ledger, deal capture, confirmation, nominations/scheduling, volume management and settlements (invoice and cash payments/collections). We will articulate how it works and how it hopefully makes sense for you to let us add a few more resources to accomodate your growing business instead of you building it from scratch. I also talked to Whalley and Bibi about your concerns on security/neutrality, comparable service levels to Enron, term and the ability to do financial easier than physical. We can go through all that as well. I will contact you soon and arrange a time. Let me know your thoughts. Piper