Subject: RE: Clayton Energy
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:04:13 -0800 (PST)

Frank, where are we on the review you were heading up after our conference call with Dave
	and Measurement?  Looks like more and more customers are questioning our numbers.
	If there is anything we can do to help you out, please let me know.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Floyd, Jodie  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Anderson, Gary E.; Adams, Frankie
Cc:	Lagerstrom, Karen; Semin, Frank; Blair, Lynn; Zadow, Raetta
Subject:	Clayton Energy

Gary,  I received a call on 11/13 from Bill Lindley (Clayton Energy) agent for City of Hartley, IA.  Bill was inquiring about the actual daily volume allocations at POI 60551, Meter Number 722015-01.  He incurred about $5,503.35 in DDVC penalties for the month of Oct.  2001 due to daily variances at the TBS.  Bill was asking if the actuals were estimated from the 17th - 31st.  In checking with Frankie the end of the month index readings were used to estimate the volume due to the chart being received after close.  

Bill (Clayton Energy) has requested that we pull the chart(s) and check the reading to verify that the penalties and the daily volume are correct for the month of Oct..  Bill has provided me with the daily readings from his check meter at this TBS to compare with.  This check will determine if the daily volumes need to be reallocated and a PPA generated.  

Give me a call if you have any questions.    

						j.  floyd