Message-ID: <33351994.1075857851615.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:10:00 -0800 (PST)
From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net
To: nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net
Subject: Out-of-Merit for Load Pick Up
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net
X-To: "'nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net'" <nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Larry_Campbell_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Campbell-L
X-FileName: lcampbel.nsf

"Kirkpatrick, Joe" <joe.kirkpatrick@nrgenergy.com> writes to the 
NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:



Is evening load pick up a security issue or an economic issue?
Loading a Gilboa to peak shave is outside of the market rules. There are
other bids that should have been accepted prior to this control action.

27-Nov-2000 15:45:59 ISO REQUESTS GILBOA___4 OUT OF MERIT FOR ISO SECURITY.
EVENING LOAD PICK UP AT 16:00 11/27/00

If the NYISO is under generated due to load pick up why are GTs not
dispatched instead of loading generation out-of-merit.
If the NYISO is loading Gilboa to satisfy 10 min spinning reserve why are
not 10 min non-spin generators or 30 minute non-spin generators dispatched
prior to dispatching generation out-of-merit.
Both 10 minute and 30 minute non-spin generators if generated could be
generated displacing 10 spinning reserve negating the need to dispatch
Gilboa out-of-merit.
As always due to limited info available conclusions are drawn based on info
available. If more info is available please post it.

Thanks

Joe