Message-ID: <28925789.1075851881503.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT) From: jfields@argentinc.com To: lcampbe@enron.com Subject: FW: RE: Engines and GF Status Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jon Fields X-To: "'lcampbe@enron.com'" X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Larry_Campbell_Nov2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: CAMPBELL-L X-FileName: lcampbe.nsf Larry, Here is the agencies opinion on your project at Spraberry. How do you feel about testing one of those engines? Jon -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Stewart [SMTP:DSTEWART@tnrcc.state.tx.us] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:59 PM To: jfields@argentinc.com Cc: Jim Linville; James Randall Subject: Fwd: RE: Engines and GF Status FYI >>> Jim Linville 08/28/00 02:21PM >>> IF there is no increase in emissions, this is probably not a modification and the Grandfathered status would remain. They would need to demonstrate that there is no change. This could require testing before and after the change. >>> Duncan Stewart 08/28/00 01:43PM >>> What say you all?