Message-ID: <7140771.1075851911001.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:58:00 -0800 (PST) From: jfields@argentinc.com To: ruth.jensen@enron.com Subject: Turbines Cc: larry.campbell@enron.com, rick.loveless@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: larry.campbell@enron.com, rick.loveless@enron.com X-From: "Jon Fields" X-To: X-cc: , X-bcc: X-Folder: \Larry_Campbell_Nov2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: CAMPBELL-L X-FileName: lcampbe.nsf I spoke with Eduardo Acosta at the TNRCC. He has stated that if a turbine is not subject to any NSPS or 30 TAC 117 requirements you don't have to list them on an OP-UA form. I've prepared the renewals with an OP-UA11 form that makes a negative Subpart GG applicability statement. However, if you prefer I can remove these forms. Having the forms in the permit makes it clear to an inspector that the turbine is "grandfathered" from GG. What is your preference? Jon E. Fields, REM Argent Consulting Services, Inc. Ph: (281) 953-1008 Fx: (291) 759-9656