Message-ID: <1829096.1075853548168.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:03:00 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: richard.sanders@enron.com
Subject: McConville consulting agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Michelle Cash
X-To: Richard B Sanders
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Cash_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: mcash_NonPriv.nsf

Richard, My thought is that the first sentence is ok, but not the second, and 
Bonnie is conveying that to McConville's lawyer.  MHC

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 05:03 
PM ---------------------------


Bonnie White@ENRON
12/12/2000 04:59 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: McConville consulting agreement

McConville's counsel has asked us for language in addition to a mere 
representation that the Enron Milford certificate of incorporation applies to 
ENA to the effect that we will cooperate or at least not unreasonably oppose 
Kevin's making a claim for indemnification should the situation arise.  I 
have drafted language along the lines of what I think he is asking for.  Is 
this something that we would consider agreeing to?



Bonnie J. White
Enron Litigation Unit
1400 Smith St., Suite 4824
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-7244
Fax: (713) 853-6576