Message-ID: <84272.1075863722432.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:28:00 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: david.minns@enron.com
Subject: Re: Employment Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Michelle Cash
X-To: David Minns
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Cash_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: mcash.nsf

David,

The "gardening leave provision would apply beyond the term.

I will make your tweak to 3.4.

I checked the 12-months with Clayton Utz, and they thought it was ok.

I'll forward a new draft in the next day or so.  Hope you had a good trip 
back.

MIchelle





David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/29/2000 10:44 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Employment Agreement  

Michelle thanks, Only one point -  it was my understanding that the 
"gardening leave" provision would also apply to a resignation after the end 
of the 2 year period. In other words if I resigned in 4 years (and assuming 
no further service contract had been put in place) the company could prevent 
me taking another job for upto 3 months after the termination if there was 
pay for that period.

Two other points;
The new paragraph in 3.4 could be read to infer that the Monthly Base Salary 
for the non-compete period would be paid up-front. Would it be safer to pay 
monthly conditional upon compliance with the obligations?
Have we thought about the enforcability of the 12 month non-compete for 
resignations during the term? This is not a concern to me and I am content 
with the existing arrangement for my contract. However, as a far as the 
precedent is concerned I would like a provision we could definitely enforce.

I will call you tomorrow to discuss.