Message-ID: <14960398.1075862043965.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 06:52:02 -0800 (PST)
From: cole.brown@enron.com
To: michelle.cash@enron.com
Subject: RE: You've previously reviewed, revised and approved the attached
Cc: kriste.sullivan@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: kriste.sullivan@enron.com
X-From: Brown, Cole </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MBROWN8>
X-To: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mcash>
X-cc: Sullivan, Kriste </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ksulliv>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst

Great!  Kriste, if there are any questions you believe to be inappropriate for general publication, please note and I will follow up with David Oxley.  Thanks, Cole.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cash, Michelle 
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:19 AM
To: Brown, Cole
Cc: Sullivan, Kriste
Subject: RE: You've previously reviewed, revised and approved the attached
Sensitivity: Confidential


Cole, I have passed these on to Kriste for final blessing.  I looked at these briefly, however, and would question whether we want these answers out for everyone to see.  I think that some of these questions really should be for internal HR only.  My guess is that David probably should decide what and how much he wants to raise in the public.  Thanks.  Michelle

-----Original Message----- 
From: Brown, Cole 
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 1:40 PM 
To: Cash, Michelle 
Cc: 
Subject: You've previously reviewed, revised and approved the attached



Michelle, please advise whether the attached questions are ready for publication.  I don't think any of these specific require SEC Legal approval, let me know your thoughts.  Thanks, Cole.


<<RJohnson QA-Answers.xls>>