Message-ID: <16563047.1075860501254.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 04:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: gina.corteselli@enron.com
Subject: Re: proposed cluster descriptors
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Michelle Cash
X-To: Gina Corteselli
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Cash_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: mcash.nsf

Gina, I am not sure that the "Satisfactory" descriptor is accurate.  "Met" 
expectations probably does not fit the average person's view of a person in 
Satisfactory.  Perhaps "met most, but not all" or something like that would 
be more accurate.

Where are we on the total revamp?  Has that been postponed until next year?

Thanks.  Michelle



   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Gina Corteselli @ ENRON                           10/09/2000 11:11 AM
	

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: proposed cluster descriptors

Hi Michelle;

I have attached the latest version of the proposed cluster descriptors for 
year end-2000.  We would like to have these reviewed by the VP/MD PRC 
Committee tomorrow , but wanted to ensure that you saw them first.  They 
comprise merely a refinement of the present descriptors, with an effort to 
demonstrating "relativity".  let me know your thoughts, thanks, G