Message-ID: <7258141.1075855359668.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:39:21 -0800 (PST)
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: david.oxley@enron.com
Subject: RE: Please review
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Cash, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCASH>
X-To: Oxley, David </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Doxley>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michelle_Cash_Jan2002\Cash, Michelle\Sent Items
X-Origin: Cash-M
X-FileName: mcash (Non-Privileged).pst

One other thing -- Texas law will apply to those employees in Texas, as state courts will not allow other laws to govern in employee matters.  Oregon is the same.

As I re-read, I found more references to vesting or payout dates.  Again, these should be more generic or blank.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David  
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Please review

 << File: Netco retention general 122101.doc >>