Message-ID: <4778790.1075852054499.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 06:27:00 -0800 (PST) From: jdreskin@ingaa.org To: heegp@epenergy.com, hendricksond@epenergy.com, shelley_corman@enron.com, janice.alperin@coastalcorp.com, daniel.collins@coastalcorp.com, burumc@kochind.com, mcmaho1m@kochind.com, clevander@columbiaenergygroup.com, wwgrygar@cmsenergy.com, avcochrane@cmsenergy.com, scott.c.turkington@williams.com, jneason@wcp.twc.com, anne_bomar@dom.com, reitzd@natfuel.com, marsha.palazzi@neg.pge.com, nancy.bagot@enron.com Subject: Marketing affiliates Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Joan Dreskin X-To: "Peggy Heeg (E-mail)" , "David Hendrickson (E-mail)" , "Shelley Corman (E-mail)" , "Janice Alperin (E-mail)" , "Daniel F. Collins (E-mail)" , "Claire A. Burum (E-mail)" , "Michael E. McMahon (E-mail)" , "Carl Levander (E-mail)" , "William Grygar (E-mail)" , "Anna V. Cochrane (E-mail)" , "Scott Turkington (E-mail)" , "Judy Neason (E-mail)" , "Anne Bomar (E-mail)" , "David Reitz (E-mail)" , "Marsha Palazzi (E-mail)" , "Nancy Bagot (E-mail)" X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Shelley_Corman_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: CORMAN-S X-FileName: scorman.nsf CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT -----Original Message----- From: rkruse@duke-energy.com [mailto:rkruse@duke-energy.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 4:25 PM To: jdreskin@INGAA.org Subject: M E M O R A N D U M To:?????? Joan Dreskin From:????????? Richard J. Kruse Re:?????? Docket No. PL00-1, Marketing Affiliate Rules ???? Attached is Duke Energy Gas Transmission's draft of the sections which Duke? agreed? to? prepare.? We look forward to discussing these with you in more? detail.?? Duke? believes? that? it? is? critically important that the distinction be made between gas and electric industries since that seems to be? a? topic? that? is? high on the FERC Staff's mind and you will see this reflected? in our draft.? In addition, we would echo the thoughts forwarded to? you? by? Janice Alperin about the need to employ an expert.? As you can see,? many? of? the? arguments? in this draft need support from an economic expert. ???? Duke? believes that INGAA should view of the utilization of experts on a long-term basis, not just for comments to be filed on January 5, 2001, or the? presentation? on? January? 31,? 2001.? This is likely to be an ongoing dialogue and that there well may be opportunities for further presentations and? for reply to anecdotal evidence presented by others.? Also, we believe that? the? use? of? more? than? one policy expert would be appropriate.? In particular,? we? feel it would be helpful to have an expert with a national reputation? that? could address the issues from a broad policy and economic prospective? and? we? would like to discuss specific recommendations at our next meeting. ???? Duke? will? make? available? whatever internal resources are needed to help in developing the INGAA comments for filing on January 5, 2001, and in the? preparation? of? the? presentation? to? be? made? on January 31, 2001. However, Duke believes that this is a long-term effort that ought not to be limited? by? the? short-term? time? deadline? we? currently? face.? In some respects,? it? may be preferable to "wait and see" what the allegations are from the other side and weigh in at that time. ???? We? look? forward? to? further? discussions? with you at your earliest convenience. ??????????????????????????????????? RJK Attachment (See attached file: Dec11INGAAPotentialApp.doc) ? - Dec11INGAAPotentialApp.doc