Message-ID: <9390112.1075861070506.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:27:18 -0800 (PST)
From: kvanpelt@cmsenergy.com
Subject: REQ versus RGQ documents presented to the Board
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kim R VanPelt <kvanpelt@cmsenergy.com>
X-To: dale.m.davis@williams.com, Hess, Theresa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=THESS>, randy.young@gulfsouthpl.com, mark.gracey@elpaso.com, william.griffith@elpaso.com, rkruse@duke-energy.com, ron.m.mucci@williams.com, Corman, Shelley </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SCORMAN>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Shelley_Corman_Mar2002\Corman, Shelley\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Corman-S
X-FileName: scorman (Non-Privileged).pst

Just noticed that the word "retail" is not added to the supplier segment
definition in the REQ document....k

Kim Van Pelt
GISB Coordinator
CMS Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
(713)989-7354
kvanpelt@cmsenergy.com