Message-ID: <32289878.1075861091400.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 04:22:28 -0800 (PST) From: mike.bryant@enron.com To: frazier.king@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com Subject: RE: Trunkline OBA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Bryant, Mike X-To: King Jr., Frazier , Corman, Shelley X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Shelley_Corman_Mar2002\Corman, Shelley\Inbox\Archives X-Origin: Corman-S X-FileName: scorman (Non-Privileged).pst I think it would be good for us all to settle on a standard level of daily and monthly tolerance. It will be easier to manage the system if we have consistency. I understand we may need one standard for larger interconnects and one for smaller interconnects. -----Original Message----- From: King Jr., Frazier Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:47 PM To: Corman, Shelley; Bryant, Mike Subject: FW: Trunkline OBA Mike, were you ok with the 5% daily tolerance and the 50,000 Dth monthly tolerance? -----Original Message----- From: Farrell, Sharon Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:53 PM To: King Jr., Frazier Subject: RE: Trunkline OBA I discussed wtih Mike before I drafted it. Trunkline is completely different. THey are smaller interconnects in constrained areas. They have a tendency to underdeliver at one of the points. We don't want to give them alot of slack, but netting together cuts our exposure. Sheila is Director of Gas Logistics ---- that's who always looked at them before, if at all. -----Original Message----- From: King Jr., Frazier Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:28 PM To: Farrell, Sharon Subject: RE: Trunkline OBA Sharon I'm not sure Sheila is the one for sign off. Also, I'm not sure we have our act together. We need to do that before the draft goes out. I am especially concerned about the suggested tolerances. Given our recent discussions, they may be too low. If anything, it seems like they are less then the recent Shelley/Mike guidelines. (Maybe we need some more "official" guidelines.) If Trunkline sees these numbers, it may be hard to change the tolerances. Finally, Shelley and Mike may be concerned if we sent it out without their comments. I will continue to press for input. Frazier -----Original Message----- From: Farrell, Sharon Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:17 PM To: King Jr., Frazier Subject: RE: Trunkline OBA Why can't we just get Sheila's signoff. It isn't like we are doing anything radical here. Trunkline hasn't even seen it yet, so they might make more changes --- it's just our standard GISB agreement. I think Trunkline should actually review before Shelley anyway. (for discussion purposes) -----Original Message----- From: King Jr., Frazier Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:45 PM To: Farrell, Sharon Subject: Trunkline OBA Sharon, I have placed several calls to Shelley about the Trunkline OBA. I have not heard back and she is not in today. So, I just sent the draft to Mike to get his input. Frazier