Subject: FW: MEC Alternate Point Usage
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:07:08 -0800 (PST)

Per our earlier process discussion ...
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn  
Sent:	Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:36 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	FW: MEC Alternate Point Usage

	FYI.  Thought you would be interested in this.  Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zadow, Raetta  
Sent:	Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:47 PM
To:	[email-masked]'; Fancler, Dan; Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn; Johnson, Alice
Cc:	Dasilva, Esther; Zadow, Raetta
Subject:	FW: MEC Alternate Point Usage

fyi, Kathy will be doing a manual invoice and a journal voucher to reverse the manual invoice that we originally did - if you have any other questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

Raetta

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	[email-masked]@ENRON  
Sent:	Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:38 PM
To:	Washington, Kathy; Zadow, Raetta
Cc:	[email-masked]
Subject:	MEC Alternate Point Usage

Upon further review with Frank regarding the alternate point usage on contract 23844 for the months of November '00, December '00, January '01, February '01 and March '01, it was determined there wasn't a violation.  MidAmerican is allowed 50,000 MMBtu/day delivered to alternate delivery points in association with contract 23844.  This information was overlooked at the time and since has been evaluated.  Please make the necessary corrections so that it is reflected that MEC did not have any alternate point use charges for those months .  If you need additional documentation, please let me know.
Thanks,
Courtney
(402) 398-7130