Message-ID: <8595427.1075861489899.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:37:10 -0800 (PST)
From: aweller@sel.com
To: jsmollon@newwestenergy.com, rschlanert@electric.com, arem@electric.com
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation o f
 Su spension DA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Weller, Andrea <AWeller@sel.com>
X-To: 'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com', RSchlanert@electric.com, arem@electric.com
X-cc: douglass@energyattorney.com, Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JDASOVIC>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Dasovich-J
X-FileName: JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged).pst

ok

Andrea Weller
Market Strategist
Strategic Energy, LLC
Office: (714) 573-1014
Cell:    (949) 230-3404
aweller@sel.com


-----Original Message-----
From: jsmollon@newwestenergy.com [mailto:jsmollon@newwestenergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:35 PM
To: RSchlanert@electric.com; JSMOLLON@newwestenergy.com;
arem@electric.com
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
o f Su spension DA


how about 4:00 p.m. conference call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rebecca Schlanert [mailto:RSchlanert@electric.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:33 PM
To: 'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com'; arem@electric.com
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
o f Su spension DA


I would be open to this as well.

Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	jsmollon@newwestenergy.com [SMTP:jsmollon@newwestenergy.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
> To:	arem@electric.com
> Cc:	douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> Subject:	Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
> of Su spension DA
> 
> I have had an opportunity to talk to most of you regarding the attached 
> proposal.  I apologize I ran out of time yesterday and didn't catch
> everyone.
> 
> NWE would like to propose a slightly different take on our AREM filing
> having had a chance to think more about it.  I wanted to run it by
> everyone
> to get your thoughts before submitting a redline.  If you feel this
> warrants
> a conference call I will gladly set one up for today.  Time is of the
> essence and would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible.  If we all
> agree, I would like to get the re-write with everyone's blessing to Dan by
> tomorrow at 8:00 am. or sooner.  
>  <<arm-puc-plan.doc>> 
> Proposal Benefits
> 
> 	1.	We look more reasonable and agree to much of what UDCs are
> proposing.
> 	2.	Accommodates most, if not all, of ESP and customer concerns.
> 	3.	Strong argument for avoiding any contract review.    Our
> verification proposal could backfire; PUC could accept our approach, but
> add
> details which goes toward ESPs submitting contracts to the PUC for review
> and validation 
> Thank you, 
> Janie Mollon
> Manager, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
> Office:  602-629-7758
> FAX: 602-629-7772
> Mobile:  602-625-3892 
>  << File: arm-puc-plan.doc >>