Message-ID: <3631427.1075851596065.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 06:14:13 -0700 (PDT) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: susan.mara@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: CALIFORNIA NEXT STEPS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Mara, Susan , Dasovich, Jeff X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst Can we talk at 9am your time - lots going on. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Williams, Robert C. Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:13 PM To: Mara, Susan Cc: Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry Subject: RE: 1 cent surcharge Sue, thanks. I think it would be a good idea to see what others with Direct Access customers and a negative CTC balance are considering doing. -----Original Message----- From: Mara, Susan Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:46 PM To: Williams, Robert C. Cc: Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry Subject: RE: 1 cent surcharge As I mentioned previously, ARM is supporting the SCE approach which does not charge DA customers for the 1 cent. ARM is working with the Energy Div staff to get a favorable ruling on it. We decided that approach had the highest probability of success. But ARM will seek to change the earlier order charging DA if this approach doesn't work. I have not really talked to other ARM members on the PX Credit balances. I can if you like. I believe we should follow the requirements in our tariff and ESP/UDC agreement for a dispute as the best first step. -----Original Message----- From: Williams, Robert C. Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 4:50 PM To: Mara, Susan Subject: 1 cent surcharge Sue, Any information about whether ARM plans to challenge the passthrough of this? Also, on a separate subject, are there any plans to challenge PG&E's and SCE's removing our PX Credit balances from customer's bills?