Subject: RE: Analysis of Prices Charged for Power Sold to DWR
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], pr <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:49:02 -0700 (PDT)

Jeff we talked about developing messages around PGE's pricing, etc.  I'll check with the PGE folks to get a good set of facts to address this issue.  Messaging is tough, but I'd suggest we focus on:  (1) the total dollars at issue--$318,071 isn't a big deal; (2) PGE is 61 out of 74 in terns of total sales; and (3) PGE's took a position in the market and is selling power purchased at high prices (PGE is a net short position).  

The additional facts we need are how the dollars flow to Enron Corp. given PGE's power cost adjustment stipulation.   

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen; Robertson, Linda; Mara, Susan; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Kaufman, Paul; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Analysis of Prices Charged for Power Sold to DWR

FYI.

In case you haven't seen it. According to MRW's analysis for IEP, Portland General sold the highest-price power to DWR in 1Q01. But at $318,071, PGE is 61 out of 74 in terms of total sales dollars.  The highest is Mirant at $706 million.  

Enron Power Marketing is #60 out of 74 in terms of prices charged, and #26 in terms of totals sales to DWR (about $45MM), according to the analysis.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Analysis

 << File: dwr purchases analysis MEF3.xls >>