Message-ID: <16067259.1075851597241.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: paul.kaufman@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Analysis of Prices Charged for Power Sold to DWR
Cc: richard.shapiro@enron.com, j..kean@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, 
	linda.robertson@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, 
	harry.kingerski@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, 
	michael.tribolet@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, 
	pr <.palmer@enron.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: richard.shapiro@enron.com, j..kean@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, 
	linda.robertson@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, 
	harry.kingerski@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, 
	michael.tribolet@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, 
	pr <.palmer@enron.com>
X-From: Kaufman, Paul </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PKAUFMA>
X-To: Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jdasovic>
X-cc: Shapiro, Richard </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rshapiro>, Kean, Steven J. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Skean>, Denne, Karen </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kdenne>, Robertson, Linda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Notesaddr/cn=e6f34021-58c07703-86256984-56518c>, Mara, Susan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Smara>, Kingerski, Harry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Hkingers>, Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jsteffe>, Tribolet, Michael </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtribole>, Kaufman, Paul </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pkaufma>, Palmer, Mark A. (PR) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mpalmer>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst

Jeff we talked about developing messages around PGE's pricing, etc.  I'll check with the PGE folks to get a good set of facts to address this issue.  Messaging is tough, but I'd suggest we focus on:  (1) the total dollars at issue--$318,071 isn't a big deal; (2) PGE is 61 out of 74 in terns of total sales; and (3) PGE's took a position in the market and is selling power purchased at high prices (PGE is a net short position).  

The additional facts we need are how the dollars flow to Enron Corp. given PGE's power cost adjustment stipulation.   



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen; Robertson, Linda; Mara, Susan; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Kaufman, Paul; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Analysis of Prices Charged for Power Sold to DWR

FYI.

In case you haven't seen it. According to MRW's analysis for IEP, Portland General sold the highest-price power to DWR in 1Q01. But at $318,071, PGE is 61 out of 74 in terms of total sales dollars.  The highest is Mirant at $706 million.  

Enron Power Marketing is #60 out of 74 in terms of prices charged, and #26 in terms of totals sales to DWR (about $45MM), according to the analysis.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Analysis

 << File: dwr purchases analysis MEF3.xls >> 