Message-ID: <18084240.1075851601633.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: michael.tribolet@enron.com
To: michael.tribolet@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, 
	james.steffes@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, 
	lisa.mellencamp@enron.com
Subject: RE: DWR floating position (revised)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Michael Tribolet <Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate>
X-To: Michael Tribolet <Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate>, Jeff Dasovich <Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron>, Susan J Mara <Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON>, James D Steffes <James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate>, Harry Kingerski <Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate>, Lisa Mellencamp <Lisa Mellencamp/ENRON@enronXgate>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst


 

I mislabled the starting time-period as 2000, instead of 2001.   The rest of the figures are correct.  Jeff and I spoke about a comparison with the prior DWR forecast from April 27th, which is added.  Note that the definition of  non-contracted now is really those volumes which are either true spot or contracts less than 90 days in duration.   In other words, heavily exposed to price risk.   A revised file is attached above.     




 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	DWR floating position

To answer Jeff's question from yesterday, and with the new DWR info, the attached spreadsheet indicates the non contracted (floating) position of DWR. 


 << File: m010724a.xls >>