Message-ID: <31562415.1075851602369.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: alan.comnes@enron.com
To: steve.hall@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com, tracy.ngo@enron.com, 
	tim.heizenrader@enron.com, christopher.calger@enron.com
Subject: DWR Revenue Requirement
Cc: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
X-From: Alan Comnes <Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate>
X-To: Steve C Hall <Steve C Hall/ENRON@enronXgate>, Christian Yoder <Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate>, Tracy Ngo <Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate>, Tim Heizenrader <Tim Heizenrader/ENRON@enronXgate>, Christopher F Calger <Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate>
X-cc: Jeff Dasovich <Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst

The information was released yesterday.  The total revenue requirement is down reflecting lower power costs. Presumably, current rates (including the $40/MWh increase since 1/1/01) are now sufficient to cover power costs and some amount for past undercollections. 

Not sure what it assumes regarding agreement-in-principal contracts (i.e., whether they are in or out).

Alan Comnes