Message-ID: <23701740.1075851605436.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 16:17:00 -0700 (PDT) From: jbennett@gmssr.com To: harry.kingerski@enron.com, jdasovic@enron.com, james_d_steffes@enron.com, smara@enron.com Subject: FW: A.00-11-038 et al. (ALJ Pulsifer's Ruling) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: JBennett X-To: Harry Kingerski (E-mail) , Jeff Dasovich (E-mail) , Jim Steffes (E-mail) , Sue Mara (E-mail) X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst FYI- The attached ruling denies PG&E's motion to combine the issues surrounding the DWR revenue requirement and revenue allocation with the utility retained generation proceeding. The ruling, however, sets an alternative schedule for separate consideration of the DWR revenue requirement and allocation issues as they relate to PG&E and SCE (not SDG&E). The commission has requested more information from DWR on the revenue requirement it submitted on May 2nd and upon receipt of that information will give parties the opportunity to review it and file comments. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pulmano, Erlinda [mailto:eap@cpuc.ca.gov] > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:04 PM > To: > Subject: A.00-11-038 et al. (ALJ Pulsifer's Ruling) > > <> - CPUC01-#101299-v1-A0011038_et_al__Pulsifer_Ruling_.doc