Message-ID: <27892607.1075843079511.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:42:00 -0800 (PST)
From: bruno.gaillard@enron.com
To: robert.frank@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, tom.hoatson@enron.com, 
	harry.kingerski@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com
Subject: Working Points - DG OIR Phase I and Phase II - for discussion only
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Bruno Gaillard
X-To: Robert Frank, Jeff Dasovich, Tom Hoatson, Harry Kingerski, Susan J Mara
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Distributed generation
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Attached below are ORA phase one and phase two draft positions, which they 
are working on to get as many parties to embrace. (UC/USC, DGS, manufacturs, 
QFs, ESPs,...)  
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 03/31/2000 
04:37 PM ---------------------------


"Morse, Jay" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov> on 03/31/2000 03:57:12 PM
To: Anthony Mazy <am1@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Brown [DGS], Andy" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, 
"Bruno Gaillard, Enron" <bgaillar@enron.com>, "Davidson, Kieth" 
<kdavidson@onsitesycom.com>, "Duggan, Kevin" <kduggan@capstoneturbine.com>, 
"Dunlop GRA, Beth" <bdunlop@gralegal.com>, "Finkelstein, Bob" 
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>, George Cluff <ill@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Greenberg, Steven" 
<sgreen1@ix.netcom.com>, "Gruenich, Dian" <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "Lindh, 
Karen" <karen@klindh.com>, "Matteson, Gary" <gary.matteson@ucop.edu>, Matthew 
Freedman <freedman@turn.org>, "McCrea, Kieth (CMA Counsel)" 
<KMcCrea@sablaw.com>, "McLafferty [nextek], Patrick" <nextek3@msn.com>, 
"Shames, Mike" <mshames@ucan.org>, "Skowronski, Mark" 
<mark.skowronski@alliedsignal.com>, "Teague @DGS, Jonathan" 
<jonathan.teague@dgs.ca.gov>, "Thomas, Aaron" <athomas@newenergy.com>, 
"Townley, David" <dtownley@newenergy.com>, "Treadway, Nat" 
<treadway@alumni.princeton.edu>, Valenzuela PE Tony CSU 
<tvalenzuela@calstate.edu>
cc:  
Subject: Working Points - DG OIR Phase I and Phase II - for discussion on ly




 <<Erin Brockovichrev3.doc>> 

Dear all, here is a proposed quid (separation of ownership of DG from 
dispatch) pro quo (discounts, exit fees, standby charges reasonable to DG).? 
Not intended to supplant? UC/CSU's excellent 8 points but to put some flesh 
on the bones of some of those points. Main idea is that if ORA et al receive 
support for separation of ownership from dispatch, we can be supportive of 
reasonable rates pertaining to DG.? Please comment.

 - Erin Brockovichrev3.doc